A staircase, an 83-year-old who insists he's fine, and a house full of memories
- Vincent Lam
- Aug 5
- 5 min read
A question we keep circling back to, and still haven't answered.
My father-in-law is 83 and lives with us, in the two-storey house where my wife and I raised our kids over the last 22 years. He's sharp, certain of himself, and entirely convinced he doesn't need us worrying about him. He's probably right, most of the time.
He'll tell you he's still fine on the stairs. Most days, he probably is. But lately I've noticed myself watching a little more closely than I used to — the hand that reaches for the railing a beat later than it should, the small pause at the top before he starts down. Nothing has happened. That's almost the point.
But I've started thinking about what happens if, one day, he isn't.
When I brought it up with my wife — gently, the way you bring up something you're not ready to say out loud yet — she understood right away. But she also went quiet. This is the house our kids grew up in. Every stair has a memory attached to it, and not one of those memories is about falling. Asking her to imagine leaving isn't really a housing question. It's asking her to imagine which parts of the past she's willing to let go of, and when.
So there we are. Three people, three different relationships to the same set of stairs, and no clear answer among us. I'm telling you this not because we've figured it out — we haven't — but because I suspect a fair number of you are somewhere in your own version of this, whether it's about a parent, a spouse, or, quietly, yourselves.
Why this kind of decision gets stuck
Here's what I've come to notice about situations like ours: they rarely arrive with a clear signal telling you it's time to act. A job loss forces a decision. A health scare forces a decision. Those are loud enough to break through anything.
But most of the time, that's not what actually happens. What happens instead is quieter, and in some ways harder to act on: the fit between a person and their house slowly changes, while the house itself stays exactly the same. Researchers who study aging and housing have found that satisfaction with owning a home tends to rise for years — and then, somewhere around the early 60s, it starts to quietly decline.[1] Not because people love their homes any less, but because the physical demands of the house — the stairs, the upkeep, the size of it all — slowly stop matching what the body can comfortably do.
That decline is a real signal. It's just a slow one — and slow signals rarely feel urgent enough to make anyone act on them. There's actually a name for what tends to happen instead: psychological inertia. The idea is simple, if a little humbling — people don't usually stay in a situation because they've weighed it out and decided staying is best. They stay because no single moment has come along that's loud enough to push them to reconsider. The satisfaction keeps eroding. The question keeps not getting asked. And most of us simply keep living in that growing gap, waiting for a moment that, for many people, never quite arrives.
And even when someone does work up the will to act, the road there isn't exactly inviting. Packing up a life, deciding what to keep and what to let go of, timing a sale, waiting for the right offer, bidding on a new place while trying not to overpay — none of it is simple, and all of it is the kind of stress most people would rather postpone than face head-on. But the harder fear often isn't the move itself. It's what waits on the other side. A client of mine put it best, not long after finally purchasing a place in a retirement residence: “I'm not sure if I'm going to like the new place.” She'd made the decision. She'd done the hard part. And she still didn't know if she'd feel at home once she got there.
A few ways to hold this well, even without an answer
Here are a few things I've been trying to keep in mind, for what they're worth:
Separate the love from the logistics, on purpose. My wife's attachment to this house and my concern about the stairs are two completely different questions, even though they feel tangled together into one impossible knot. One is about memory and meaning. The other is about safety and practicality. They don't have to be resolved together, and trying to solve them as a single decision is often what makes the whole thing feel frozen. Naming them separately doesn't make the decision easy — but it makes it possible to actually talk about, instead of just avoiding.
Let two true things be true at once. My father-in-law can be genuinely capable and still be worth watching closely. Those aren't contradictions, even though it can feel disloyal to hold both — like noticing the risk is somehow a vote of no confidence in him. It isn't. You don't need proof of decline to justify a little more attention, and you don't need certainty about the future to start a conversation now, while there's still room to choose calmly rather than scramble later.
Keep the conversation open, not closed. We haven't set a date or a deadline for ourselves — I don't think this is a decision that works on a schedule. What we have done is agree to keep talking about it, exploring what the options might even look like, without pressure to land on an answer by any particular point. That's a small shift, but it matters: the conversation stays alive instead of getting shelved until something forces it back open.
Where we've landed — which is to say, nowhere yet
I don't have a tidy ending for you, because we don't have one for ourselves. We haven't decided anything. The stairs are still the stairs, my father-in-law still insists he's fine, and my wife still isn't ready to imagine an empty version of this house. I'm not sure any of that changes soon.
But I've noticed that simply having asked the question — out loud, honestly, without demanding an immediate answer — has already changed something in our house. It's no longer a thing none of us is saying. It's a thing we're thinking about together, which is a very different kind of hard.
If any of this sounds familiar — a parent who insists they're fine, a spouse who isn't ready to let go, or a quiet worry you haven't said out loud yet — my only real suggestion is the same thing I'm trying to do myself: don't wait for a crisis to ask the question. Have the conversation while it's still just a conversation, and not yet an emergency.
If it would help to talk through how a moment like this fits into your broader plan, you know where to find me.
The comments contained herein are a general discussion of certain issues intended as general information only and should not be relied upon as tax or legal advice. Please obtain independent professional advice, in the context of your particular circumstances. This newsletter was written, designed and produced by Vincent Lam, CFP®, Financial Planner with Intentional Retirement Planning and Investia Financial Services Inc., and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Investia Financial Services Inc.
The information contained in this article comes from sources we believe reliable, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or reliability. The opinions expressed are based on an analysis and interpretation dating from the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Furthermore, they do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities.
Mutual Funds are offered through Investia Financial Services Inc. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.
Comments